Arizona Legal Opinions (a practice group of Stein Law, PLC) is able to issue and deliver attorney opinion letters for all commercial real estate loan transactions, including those in which we advise a client on legal matters from start to finish or for out-of-state attorneys or clients whose real estate transaction requires representation in Arizona. Our team is experienced with preparing and negotiating various types of agency financing, traditional bank loans, CMBS transactions and hard money loans.
We represent a variety of borrower clients on large and small commercial loan transactions and regularly works with lenders from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, major life companies and institutional lenders to provide required legal opinions.
As local counsel, we can issue an entire opinion or work with your counsel to provide only Arizona portions (i.e., enforceability of an Arizona Deed of Trust). We can provide opinions in connection with secured and unsecured financing transactions, including acquisition financing, construction lending, and loan refinancings.
Contact us for more information.
CALL 480-889-8948
We charge a flat fee for our attorney opinion letters that are project-based and agreed upon in advance based on the applicable loan terms and scope of the representation.
Stein Law, PLC represents and advises businesses and individuals in their commercial real estate sales, leases and developments and other types of corporate and business transactions.
Scott J. Stein, the firm’s managing attorney, is AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell®, the highest recognition possible in the legal industry for ethical standards and legal ability. He was also included in the most recent editions of The Best Lawyers in America for Real Estate Law.
He has written on the Myths and Facts related to Opinion Letters and presented on Structuring Opinions of Counsel in Real Estate Finance Transactions and Navigating Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations and Use of Letters, Reducing Risks for Opinion Givers.
Mr. Stein often lectures and regularly provides continuing legal education to his peers and other professionals, having been featured on NBI, Inc., Strafford Publications, Inc., and the Central Arizona CCIM Chapter.
Stein Law can issue an entire opinion or work with your counsel to provide only Arizona portions (i.e., enforceability of an Arizona Deed of Trust). We can provide opinions in connection with secured and unsecured financing transactions, including acquisition financing, construction lending, and loan refinancings.
Please visit www.steinlawplc.com for more information.
Scott J. Stein is a transactional attorney at Stein Law, PLC and represents and advises businesses and individuals in their commercial real estate sales, leases and developments and other types of corporate and business transactions.
Mr. Stein has “Big Firm” experience, having worked at two the largest law firms in the country and is AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell®, the highest recognition possible in the legal industry for ethical standards and legal ability. He was also included in the 22nd Edition of The Best Lawyers in America for Real Estate Law.
Scott J. Stein has written on the Myths and Facts related to Opinion Letters and presented on Structuring Opinions of Counsel in Real Estate Finance Transactions and Navigating Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations and Use of Letters, Reducing Risks for Opinion Givers.
We can do an entire opinion or work with your counsel to provide only Arizona portions (i.e., enforceability of an Arizona Deed of Trust). We can provide opinions in connection with secured and unsecured financing transactions, including acquisition financing, construction lending, and loan refinancings.
Please visit www.steinlawplc.com for more information.
Call : 480-889-8948
Email : [email protected]
Recognized for professional excellence.
Our attorneys are prepared to examine and evaluate your particular situation.
The following is reformatted from an article on the Myths and Facts related to Opinion Letters, written by Scott J. Stein
As a condition for making any kind of commercial real estate loan, lenders require a variety of assurances and representations from the borrower (and other key principals or guarantors) to verify that the borrower has the legal standing and ability to borrow (and payback) the loan.
Beyond taking the borrower’s word for it, lenders also typically require a legal opinion from borrower’s counsel as an added layer of protection covering certain legal matters involved in the transaction – including confirmation of the legality of the actual loan document forms being used. This squarely sets nearly all risk relating to the loan transaction on the borrower and its counsel. Obviously to most outsiders (and insiders!), this process is a bit counterintuitive – as one would hope that the lender itself and its own legal counsel should confirm these matters.
Be that as it may, this is the standard custom and approach.
Given the nature of having a borrower’s own counsel opine as to these matters for a loan, it is no wonder that there are common misconceptions and myths relating to required opinions. Below is our attempt to separate the fact from fiction:
Fact: Lender’s required forms of legal opinions from borrower’s counsel vary. Each lender had its own particular form that it will require for a given transaction. Lenders are routinely changing its forms to keep up with changes in the law or, perhaps, to address problems it has encountered with previous loans. Just because a particular lender accepted one form of opinion does not mean that another will. For example, even the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac forms used in similar multi-family loans vary substantively in their form, structure and requirements.
Myth: Legal opinions are non-negotiable. There is no true “boilerplate” legal opinion form. Lenders typically have a form that it will distribute at the outset of the loan closing process, but those forms are a starting point for negotiation. Most legal opinions follow a similar format, including identification of the loan specifics but there is a wide variety of assumptions, limitations and qualifications that can be used for the required opinions.
Fact: Legal opinion are state-specific. Because the legal opinion often includes statements regarding enforceability and, in some circumstances, perfection of the lender’s security interest, the forms must be tailored to each state. As attorneys licensed to practice law in Arizona, our opinions are limited to Arizona law (and applicable federal law). However, because of our broad practice, we have clients that close transactions all over the country and so we routinely coordinate with a network of local counsel in other states for state-specific opinions and do the same for other firms and clients closing deals in Arizona.
Myth: Legal opinions require attorneys to opine as to facts. Facts are generally assumed and relied upon. Opinions are typically limited internal company matters, such as due formation and authorization based upon a review of the borrower’s organizational documents, and other enforceability and legality of loan provisions based on specific loan documents for the transaction.
Fact: Legal opinions include certain limitations and qualifications. Legal opinions will contain certain basic assumptions that should not be problematic for the lender. For example, the law firm giving the opinion may assume that the signatures on the loan documents are genuine and that documents delivered as originals are authentic and that copies of a document conform to the original.
Stein Law represents a variety of borrower clients on large and small commercial loan transactions and regularly works with the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, major life companies and institutional lenders to provide required legal opinions.
For more information please call (480) 889-8948.
By Scott J. Stein / Stein Law, PLC
The information provided in the Stein Law, PLC web site is offered purely for informational purposes. It is not intended to create or promote an attorney-client relationship, and does not constitute and should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not intended to seek professional employment in any state where lawyers in the firm are not admitted to practice, or in any state where this web site would not comply with applicable requirements concerning advertisements and solicitations.
We intend to make every attempt to keep this information current. We do not promise or guarantee, however, that the information is correct, complete or up-to-date, and internet subscribers and online readers should not act based upon this information without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted to practice in your location.
This site may contain hyperlinks to web sites operated by parties independent from the Stein Law, PLC. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Stein Law, PLC does not control such web sites, and is not responsible for their content. Inclusion of hyperlinks to such web sites does not imply any endorsement of the material on such web sites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, shall be solely at your own risk.
Transmission of information from the Stein Law, PLC web site is not intended to create, and its receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Stein Law, PLC or any of its individual attorneys or personnel. If you elect to communicate with the firm, or any of its attorneys, through this web site, do not transmit any information about any matter (and particularly not any confidential information) that may involve you until the firm has agreed to represent you, and you have received confirmation of that fact in the form of a written engagement letter.